Maël van Beek
  • About
  • Research
  • Papers
  • Teaching
  • CV
  • Projects
    • Inference from Scarce Data
    • Order-War Coevolution
    • Public preferences and international bargaining
  • Papers
    • Hierarchy and War
    • A Direct Method for the Estimation of Temporal Preferences
    • Alliance Management in the Face of Public Opinion: Experimental Evidence from the United States, Japan, and South Korea
    • An Adaptive Design for the Efficient Estimation of Temporal Preferences
    • Do Co-Party Signals on Tariffs Stretch Voters' Inflation Thresholds for Industry?
    • Dynamics of Change in International Organizations
    • Hierarchy misalignment and war: Relational and material power disparities among states
    • Likelihood-free Inference in Strategic Contexts
    • Measured in Blood: The Power to Hurt and the Public Appetite for War
    • Measurement Precision versus User Fatigue: Temporal Discounting in Politics
    • Measuring International Order: Three Approaches to an Amorphous Concept
    • Only Doves could send Nixon to China
    • Public Opinion, Democratic Institutions, and Leader Credibility
    • Refining known unknowns? Modeling and Measuring Uncertainty
    • Survey Experiments as Supervised Learning
    • The Balance of Blood: Casualty ratios and the public's threshold for war
    • The Trilemma of Hegemonic Order Competition
    • Warring Leviathans: Conflict Among Hierarchies and the Evolution of Human Prosociality
    • When Consistency Doesn't Matter: A Preference-Based Theory of Audience Costs
  • Research
  • Teaching

Alliance Management in the Face of Public Opinion: Experimental Evidence from the United States, Japan, and South Korea

Maël van Beek
Maël van Beek
Type
Manuscript

Using a survey experiment concurrently fielded in Korea, Japan, and the U.S., this project investigates what voters are looking for in an ally.

Ongoing Order-War Coevolution Public Preferences and International Bargaining Survey Experiments

© 2025 Maël van Beek.